Republican News · Thursday 11 March 1999

[An Phoblacht]

Peace process in crisis


The British-Irish Agreement Bill was passed in the Dáil this week. It establishes the legal basis for the institutions to be established under the Good Friday Agreement. We carry here the text of the speech on the Bill by Sinn Féin TD Caoimhghín ``O'Caoláin.

 
The Ulster Unionist Party, for the past eleven months, has been allowed to elevate one element of the Good Friday Agreement above all others. I must record disappointment that both governments have indulged that party in its pretense that the entire Agreement hinges upon a decommissioning gesture from the IRA.

Caoimhghín `` Caoláin TD.


I welcome this Bill as an essential step in the implementation of the Good Friday Agreement which was endorsed by 85% of the people of Ireland last year.

We in Sinn Féin were a party to that Agreement; we recognised it as an historic compromise for which all parties took political risks. Not the least of those risks was taken by Sinn Féin. We accepted key elements of the Good Friday Agreement which challenged political positions that we had held for many years. We altered our party's Constitution to allow attendance at an Assembly in the Six Counties; we urged a Yes vote in the 32 Counties after a painful and heart-searching internal debate and despite our reservations - shared by broad sections of opinion on this island - about changes to Articles Two and Three of the 1937 Constitution.

We see the Agreement as a vehicle for change in which we can all make the journey towards a just and equal society in Ireland, leaving behind the injustices of the past and the conflict which has arisen out of them. This is not a final settlement and there are many aspects of the Agreement, including the institutions which are established in this Bill, which do not go far enough. The extent of All-Ireland bodies is too limited in our view. We are concerned at the minimising of their scope at the insistence of the Ulster Unionist Party.

But like the other aspects of the Agreement these institutions can be built upon as the historical, political and economic imperative moves the divided parts of our island, and the divided sections of our people, ever closer over time. It is up to all of us to create that imperative.

If the Agreement as negotiated was being implemented then the Executive, the All-Ireland Ministerial Council, the All-Ireland Implementation Bodies, the British-Irish Council and the British-Irish Intergovernmental Conference would all have been established by now. Power could then have been transferred to those bodies and to the Assembly tomorrow, March 10th. This could and should have been the case.

I must record the disappointment and grave concern of myself and of Sinn Féin that this deadline is being allowed to pass. I believe that the Irish government should have taken a much stronger position, insisting that the Agreement as negotiated be implemented in the agreed timetable.

It is not talking up a crisis to state the plain fact that a crisis now exists in the peace process. This crisis exists because the Ulster Unionist Party, for the past eleven months, has been allowed to elevate one element of the Good Friday Agreement above all others. I say allowed because I must also record disappointment that both governments have indulged that party in its pretense that the entire Agreement hinges upon a decommissioning gesture from the IRA. This false position was given expression in what can only be described as a disgraceful editorial in the Irish Times of yesterday, 8 March, which argued that it would be better that the entire Agreement should founder than that decommissioning should not take place in the way that it is being demanded by the unionists.

The decommissioning issue is being dealt with. It is as complex as any of the other issues addressed in the Agreement. We in Sinn Féin have fulfilled and will continue to fulfil our commitment in that regard. Everyone needs to recognise the duplicity of the simplistic approach which talks of decommissioning gestures. You only have to remember the theatrical and choreographed handover of weapons by the Loyalist Volunteer Force some months ago. Armed members of this same force appeared before RTE cameras last weekend and threatened to end their ceasefire. The so-called decommissioning carried out by the LVF was valueless, a propaganda stunt by an organisation whose ceasefire itself is unstable.

Deputy Quinn referred to opinion polls and the views of republicans. I think I can reflect those views more accurately than any interpretation of a particular opinion poll.

In nationalist and republican districts in the Six Counties the decommissioning issue is seen in the context of increasing attacks and threats from loyalists as referred to at Taoiseach's Questions today, and of continuing revelations about decades of collusion between British forces and loyalist paramilitaries. It is seen in the context of over 130,000 licensed weapons in the unionist community. It is seen in the context of the continuing siege of the nationalist community on the Garvaghy Road. It is seen in the context of an unchanged, heavily armed RUC and a British Army which may be less visible in some areas but is still there in large numbers and with all its infrastructure intact. I urge Deputies Quinn and Bruton to come with me to South Armagh and to speak to the people there about decommissioning under the din of helicopters and under the shadow of dozens of hilltop posts, checkpoints and barracks.

People need to look beyond the unionist rhetoric about decommissioning and look at the real motivation. The mask slipped recently when both David Trimble and John Taylor spoke of moving forward without Sinn Féin. Unionists look to the prospect of the expulsion of Sinn Féin from the process, the breakdown of the broad republican consensus in favour of the Agreement, the splitting of the IRA from top to bottom. The sad reality is that many unionists, and significant and powerful sections of the British military establishment would relish such a prospect. They seek a defeat of Irish republicanism, a defeat that could not be achieved through 30 years of conflict.

International Commission was established to deal with the issue of decommissioning. Its work continues and Sinn Féin has worked with it. The issue is not resolved but the lack of resolution of this issue, like all the other issues in the Agreement which remain unresolved, does not prevent the formation of the Executive now. What is being allowed to prevent it is the lack of political will on the part of the Ulster Unionist Party. I urge the Irish government not to allow this to continue.

In spite of the negative political context in which this Bill comes before us I believe that it represents a tremendously positive development in the history of our country. It points to a new political dispensation for all the people of Ireland. The failures of the past - partition, sectarianism, one-party rule, repression - can be set aside and we can begin a new era of equality. Let us cast aside the obstacles and enter that new era.


Contents Page for this Issue
Reply to: Republican News