Republican News · Thursday 16 April 1998

[An Phoblacht]

Untried paths - strange vistas

By Mícheál Mac Donncha

 
Many things about the talks outcome are uncertain and open to numerous interpretations but one thing is certain. This is not a final settlement of the Anglo-Irish conflict

However you view the outcome of the multi-party talks which concluded on Good Friday there is absolutely no doubt that once again the Irish political landscape has been transformed. A geological upheaval has occurred. Familiar landmarks are missing; new obstacles and dangers have appeared; untried paths and strange vistas have opened up and they hold both perils and opportunities; everyone is challenged.

Many things about the talks outcome are uncertain and open to numerous interpretations but one thing is certain. This is not a final settlement of the Anglo-Irish conflict. More than any other group, republicans are conscious of that. They know that anything which falls short of national self-determination for the Irish people is not, and never will be, enough finally to settle the relationships between Ireland and Britain and among all sections of the Irish people. For that reason the republican struggle exists and will continue to exist until its goal is achieved.

There are many doubts about the talks outcome among republicans; there are also great hopes and a determination to address the new situation as positively as possible. It has been said before but it is true now more than ever - a new phase of struggle has begun.

Republicans are assessing this new situation. They should base their judgements on the talks document itself, on the wider political context, on republican objectives and on a strategic view of how we move forward from this point. They should not allow their assessment to be distorted by the hypes, spins and pressures of media management. Watching the negotiations unfold in the media last week was unavoidable but by now republicans should be switching off their TV sets and spending less time reading newspapers. Instead they should be reading the document and doing some hard thinking. They should be discussing it with their comrades. They should be consulting supporters of the struggle and taking soundings of opinion among the general public.

There is no doubt that the decisions to be made by republicans in the days and weeks ahead will be momentous. All republicans have to be part of the decision-making process. Unity must be the watchword.

What needs to be assessed?

The overarching question is ``Can this outcome advance the drive to national unity and independence, or, at least, not delay it?'' Some others will attempt to use this outcome to stabilise partition and British rule; republicans must make their judgements on the basis of their ability not only to thwart such reactionary efforts, but to turn the situation in a progressive direction.

What are the positive features of the document? This needs to be looked at not only in terms of the actual text but in the overall political significance of the positive aspects. For example, it could be argued that the very inclusion of policing and prisoners and the Irish language has implications far beyond the actual commitments, many of which are scant enough.

On the other hand in policing it could be argued that the issue has been put on the long finger.

But has the way been opened for real and fundamental change here? Has the RUC's future been thrown in the melting pot?

Undoubteldly the commitments on prisoners are of central importance. A word of caution is needed, though. Media spins often wilfully misinterpret republican attitudes on this issue. Throughout this process republican prisoners have made clear that they will not be used as pawns or bargaining chips for political `concessions'. Sinn Féin has said exactly the same, emphasising repeatedly that all political prisoners must be released as part of the resolution of the conflict. There has been much silly talk in the media this week about the nine releases from Portlaoise acting as a `sweetener' in advance of the Sinn Féin Ard Fheis. Proponents of such thinking patronise republicans by their approach. This struggle is not about the release of prisoners but about freedom and peace in Ireland. The prisoners themselves are activists in the struggle and they, with all other republicans, are part of the debate and decision making about the future of the struggle and the correct course which needs to be taken.

The constitutional questions are fundamental. Is what is proposed in the document `balanced constitutional change'? Again the judgement needs to be made both on the actual text of the proposed changes in the 1937 Constitution and in British legislation, and on the wider political implications of these.

What are the consequences of a new assembly in the Six Counties? How does the apparently inextricable link between the existence of an assembly and the cross-border bodies affect the nature and ethos of that assembly?

It is natural that Articles 2 and 3 would be dominant considerations for people in the 26 Counties and that the Assembly would preoccupy those in the Six. But people on both sides of the border need to look at this new scenario in all its aspects. It has implications for everyone on this island, for the nature and potential development of both states, and for the prospects of reunification.

How does this outcome affect the relationship between the Irish people as a whole and the British government? What are the political, ideological and psychological implications for the British body politic of such a major step as this by a British government? Is the devolution of powers away from Westminster towards Wales and Scotland an important consideration?

These are just some of the questions that need to debated by republicans now.

Staunchly supportive communities are eager both to have their imput into decision-making and to respond to leadership. Our debates must be conducted and our decisions made calmly and in comradeship. The only pressure to which we should respond should be our determination to achieve our political objectives.


Contents Page for this Issue
Reply to: Republican News