Sex appeal, shy Alex and censorship
By Laurence McKeown
I had thought of not making any reference at all in this week's
article to the elections as I know the paper will be full of it,
but then thought, what the heck, why not revel in it. It's not
every day we get these wee (or not so wee) victories.
The problem is that there are so many different comments that
could be made about it. For instance, did any of you compare the
faces and gestures of the newly elected Sinn Féin members Gerry
and Martin to those of Trimble and Paisley? You would have
thought the latter had lost their seats given the doom and gloom
with which they started at us through the TV cameras. I can
understand the annoyance and disappointment of the losers and the
Reverend Willie certainly treated us to a display of that, but
surely the victors could appear just a teeny weeny bit happy.
Even Dr Joe, I have to say to his credit, was fairly
statesman-like in his acceptance of defeat (though he undid that
in an Irish News interview on Tuesday when he called republicans
`fascists').
d what of the newly-elected member for West Tyrone, Willie
Thompson? I haven't even seen a photo of this man yet but had the
opportunity to listen to him on Sunday morning on the radio
outlining his political philosophy. There are a number of issues
which the boul Willie holds dear to his heart. The first one, he
says, is the issue of pro-life. There are too many abortions
being carried out, he says, and he will be voicing opposition to
this. Now the issue of abortion and a woman's right to choose is
a topic guaranteed to raise emotive arguments whenever and
wherever it is raised but I thought Willie's sincerity on the
issue was somewhat weakened by his comments on the other issue
which is dear to his heart, that of capital punishment. Willie
wants to bring back hanging.
What about those people like the Birmingham Six, the Guildford
Four, the Bridgewater Three and countless others who were wrongly
convicted and would now be dead if capital punishment had
remained on the statute books, he was asked in a later interview?
Well, Willie replied, no system is perfect and much better that
the occasional innocent person be hanged than the guilty remain
alive. There you are now. I'm sure that inspires a lot of people.
No doubt over the next five years Willie will treat us to more
profound thoughts on his concern for life in all its various
forms. By the way, Willie is also a lay-preacher. Surprise,
surprise.
Some of the other radio comments were equally interesting or
humorous. Reporting from Belfast City Hall on the morning of the
count one reporter commented that he had been speaking to Alex
Maskey about how he thought the count was going and how Alex was
shy about giving any indication of whether or not Sinn Féin would
win the seat. Back in the studio David Dunseath remarked on this
extremely unusual phenomenon, a shy Alex Maskey. This, he said,
was as rare an occurrence as a Tory who got elected.
Moving the studio discussion on to other constituencies David
referred to North Belfast and how this seemed to be the only
constituency where sex appeal was said to be a factor. He was not
speaking, of course, of Cecil Walker but our very own Gerry
Kelly. Fionnuala O'Connor disagreed with him and said this
supposed sex appeal was not evident to her. That makes at least
two who are apparently blind in this regard, the other being Ed
Moloney writing in the Sunday Tribune the previous week. Maybe An
Phoblacht should organise a phone-in on this topic. Does Gerry
Kelly have sex appeal or not? Is he sexier than, say, Gerry Adams
or Martin McGuinness? If he had stood in West Belfast or
Mid-Ulster would he have increased the vote? Could he even
attract a cross-community vote by virtue of his particular
appeal? These are issues which the Ard Chomhairle should take
seriously when planning any future electoral strategy.
It appears though that while broadcasters and political
commentators are free to interpret the election results and offer
their opinions about the outcome on air they are not so ready to
tolerate criticism of those same opinions. When Stephen Grimason
of Radio Ulster said the election results were simply another
tribal headcount an invited panellist challenged him. She (the
only woman on the panel) said it was a derogatory statement about
the electorate and their choice of who they voted for. Grimason
was infuriated. Shortly afterwards a BBC official asked her to
leave the studio even though she had been invited by the BBC to
participate and offer her analysis of the results. It's hard to
believe that these are the same people I have listened to being
verbally bullied into silence by Paisley et al over the years. It
certainly adds a new meaning to the slogan of `freedom of the
media'. A freedom which is now apparently taken to mean the
freedom to censor others.
Related articles: