By Brian Feeney (for the Irish News)
Sunday week ago on Diarmaid Ferriter’s RTE radio programme What
If?, journalists Fintan O’Toole and John Waters discussed the
question, what if there had been no Magill magazine?
Very quickly the discussion came to focus on Vincent Browne, the
brains and driving force behind Magill in the eighties and the
role he has played and continues to play in Irish journalism.
The participants came to the conclusion that the Irish media
‘grew up’ in the eighties.
Their evidence for their conclusion was that the eighties were
the time when journalists stopped being deferential to
politicians and it was Browne who played a major part in ending
deference and obsequiousness.
Browne’s refusal to give politicians an easy ride did not enjoy
universal support. The example was cited of an election press
conference called by Charlie Haughey where Browne repeatedly
asked, “Where do you get your money from Mr Haughey? What is the
source of your money?” Eventually other journalists present
shouted at him to shut up. For them Haughey’s suspected
corruption was not an issue.
They were happy to let Haughey control the press conference.
Browne wasn’t alone, however. Others were mentioned on the
programme, like John Bowman who reminded a politician at a press
conference that he was there to answer questions, indeed that as
a politician he was obliged to answer questions - that was why
he had put himself in front of the media.
What a contrast with here. When was the last time you saw our
proconsul on UTV Live or BBC Newsline? Not on a video clip
burbling from behind a lectern after some meeting with the
Taoiseach or Dermot Ahern, or in a pre-recorded interview but in
the studio, live, defending his lack of strategy, his pointless,
hand-to-mouth stunts like meeting the UDA, his child-like trust
in his officials’ belief that he can substitute activity for
action.
Evidently he can and get away with it too, for no one can get
him into a studio to explain himself.
Normally you couldn’t beat politicians out of a TV studio but
not our direct rulers. It’s true there are no votes here for
them and that, apart from the dreadful Spellar, they would be
worried to parade their ignorance of local matters, perhaps name
the wrong town, perhaps be unable to pronounce the right town.
Even so, as politicians they are obliged to explain themselves
to people here. They don’t and are allowed a free ride.
Don’t let’s hear any nonsense about Norn Irn question time in
the House of Commons either.
Oral questions on any topic in the British or Irish
parliamentary system are a conspiracy by civil servants and
ministers not to answer any questions. Besides, unionist MPs -
and apart from Eddie McGrady it’s they who mainly ask questions
- are more concerned with scoring points against each other than
extracting straight answers from direct rulers.
The absurd position we’ve reached is that if BBCNI or UTV want
to present information about the current state of play they have
to interview Barney Rowan or Ken Reid to tell the
viewers/listeners what’s going on and they do a better job of
explaining than our proconsul. When was the last time you heard
the anchor person say, as you hear on the Today Programme or
Newsnight, “We asked for a minister to come on to respond to
these points but the NIO would not put one up”?
Our present political impasse is a case in point. The NIO keeps
setting so-called deadlines which the parties correctly and
blithely ignore. Halloween was the last one. Now it’s November
25. How do we know? The Taoiseach told journalists in Rome last
week.
Why November 25? It’s the anniversary of last year’s assembly
elections. It is not: that’s November 26. Have you any idea why
there should be a deal on or before November 25 rather than say
November 30 or December 1? Who picked the date? Why? Why does no
one ask our proconsul?
Too cosy with him, that’s why. The fantasy that our proconsul is
a friend. Too many matey nods and winks instead of hard
questions and sharp criticism of his obvious shortcomings, his
complete failure as minister responsible, to make political
progress in the last year. Worry that the next time they ask,
the NIO will refuse to cooperate with a press conference or a
briefing. Who cares when the press conferences and briefings are
useless anyway?
The truth is the media, and therefore the public, have been
excluded from inter-party negotiations for the last year.
It’s our proconsul’s fault for keeping everything under wraps
and of our local parties for complying with his secrecy but it’s
the fault of the media for letting them. Too much deference you
see. Time to grow up.