Republican News · Thursday 25 March 1999

[An Phoblacht]

American media failed Rosemary Nelson

by Christy Ward

The American media soiled the memory of Rosemary Nelson last week, with one Detroit newspaper going as far as identifying the murdered Lurgan human-rights defender as an ``IRA lawyer.''

Both print and broadcast reporters, largely ignoring the Nelson murder and the threat to the Irish peace process, opted to cover issues of far greater import to the general public. For example, last week Americans were treated to - or bombarded by - nearly hourly updates on a round-the-world balloon trip by a couple of guys with too much money and too much time on their hands.

d there was the 36-straight hours of pre-Oscar drivel, including the latest on Monica, her hair, her book, her weight, her dry-cleaning bill, and her association with Vanity Fair.

To be fair, two networks did trot out some old and new faces on the Irish scene, with Seán O'Callaghan appearing on ABC and Vincent McKenna doing a piece for CBS. John Hume was unavailable; he was picking up a peace award in Antarctica.

Both O'Callaghan and McKenna say they were IRA men, which may surprise those who thought that American media have an unfavorable opinion of Irish republicans in general.

Both have benefited from the largesse of the British government, O'Callaghan as a paid spy for MI6 and McKenna as a spokesperson for the anti-republican group cleverly called ``Families Against Intimidation and Terror,'' a group funded by the British government and never seeming to comment on Unionist actions like the one that killed Rosemary Nelson.

If I didn't know better, I'd swear that there was a vast conspiracy to prevent the truth from coming out; that the British were somehow influencing what was being reported in the United States; that the WASP community had banded together to portray people like Rosemary Nelson as evil incarnate.

Even a fairly good paper like the Atlanta Journal Constitution did a story, based on a live interview with Gerry Adams at Emory University on the eve of Rosemary Nelson's murder. The piece included quotes from Rupert Murdoch's London Times newspaper, that wellspring of Irish sympathy in England.

Perhaps the American media were uncomfortable in reporting the death of Rosemary Nelson because it would require them to include the allegation that the Royal Ulster Constabulary was involved.

Some readers will recall that this column broke the story that CNN had failed to stand up to British-government censorship when Larry King first interviewed Gerry Adams.

The British government was still blacking out republican politicians, even those elected to Parliament, and did so with the CNN interview, not seen in Africa and the Middle East because of British censorship.

A spokesperson for the Larry King Show told me at the time that there was nothing CNN could do. The transmitter that beamed the show across Europe and south was in England, and CNN was afraid the Brits would yank their permit.

CNN's Ralph Beglighter, responding some years back about concerns I had raised about Adams being identified as the leader of the IRA, told me that everyone knows ``they are essentially the same,'' or some words close to that. And there's the rub. The American media play fast and loose with the facts, because some Anglophile in the State Department or some wag from the British Information Services has set them straight (over a single malt on the Empire's expense account), and they swallow it.

The media ignore the murder of Rosemary Nelson because it's difficult to explain why and how they have supported the British side for all these years. And because discovering the truth, as Jo Thomas of the NY Times found out, can be dangerous and lead to a serious journalist loosing a job.

Sad to recount, the American media could have made a major contribution to the peace in Ireland. They could have done for Ireland what they did for the civil-rights movement in the United States in the 1960s, but that would have required nearly 30 years of reporting British government-sponsored atrocities and few in the American glamour media would be willing to turn down lunch with Prince Charles for a pint with Joe Cahill.


Contents Page for this Issue
Reply to: Republican News