Republican News · Thursday 9 December 1999

[An Phoblacht]

Institutional Racism

The crisis at the Mount Street One-stop shop for asylum seekers, when the doors were closed in the faces of long queues of people who seek refuge in this state, provoked a display of racist comment in the circus press that speaks to prejudice.

Irresponsible politicians also eagerly pandered to the lowest common denominator as they spoke for electoral support.

Ivor Callely, chair of the Eastern Health Board, was supported in his remarks about `throwing out' the `illegal immigrants', by Bertie Ahern, talking to the same constituency. Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, John O'Donoghue, just as the Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Bill was passing into law, saw fit to rail against those refugees who, he claims, come over in hundreds in taxis to Dundalk.

The politicians were hotly pursued by O'Reilly's gutter press, with screaming headlines of racial abuse suffered by refugees and of scams which refugees are alleged to perpetrate.

Under cover of this darkness, the government has declared its intent to fingerprint all refugees, to make medical examinations mandatory, and to introduce a voucher scheme for those who seek asylum here. The Government has already begun implementing what it calls `dispersal', where refugees have no choice as to whether or not they wish to be `dispersed'.

At the same time, despite the failure to implement the 1996 Refugee Act, and despite two major pieces of legislation which this government has introduced, the Immigration Bill (1999), and the Illegal Immigration (Trafficking) Bill (1999), the government declares it has no immigration strategy and has set up a cross department committee to draw one up.

In reality, of course, the government does have a strategy for immigration and asylum seekers, terms it likes to confuse. It's quite simple. On immigration, it is to facilitate companies to bring in cheap labour from Eastern Europe, which is white, to fill the 50,000 jobs which cannot at present be filled. On asylum, the policy is: keep them out by ensuring that their treatment here is at least as bad as other spots in Fortress Europe.

The British are in the process of introducing a voucher scheme. Refugees are issued with vouchers instead of cash. It means separate shops, separate queues, much restricted choice, and all the petty indignities of separateness. Ireland, instead of joining other EU countries in support of policies which respect human rights, which favour treatment of asylum seekers with humanity and dignity, which pro-actively welcome cultural diversity into our society, instead simply apes the English, and promises vouchers.

These schemes, which the government plans to introduce by spring, have been roundly condemned by human rights groups, like the Irish Council for Civil Liberties and the Refugee Council. Each of these schemes sets refugees apart from the citizens of this state and denies them right to `equality before the law', as the constitution guarantees to its citizens. This is the very essence of racism - the differentiation of a class of citizens from another class of `not quite citizens'. These measures are institutionalised racism.

Dublin Corporation's recent decision not to give refugees access to the new centre for the homeless to be opened shortly in Parkgate Street, introduces discrimination which inevitably will ground racist discontents. Dublin Corporation has no excuse whatsoever not to have found accommodation for thousands of homeless people in the city, no matter where the homeless may come from, or the colour of their skin.

A consultation document drawn up by the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland - a Guide to Good Practice for Racial Equality in Education - refers to the functions of the Equality Commissioner as laid down in the Good Friday Agreement in his role to promote equality of opportunity between persons of different religious belief, political opinion, racial group, age, marital status or sexual orientation.

The question is, will the Equality Commissioner based in Dublin meet these obligations and how will that office deal with vouchers, dispersal without choice, mandatory medical examination or fingerprinting?


Contents Page for this Issue
Reply to: Republican News