Republican News · Thursday 12 March 1998

[An Phoblacht]

Policing the community

By Mary Nelis

The topic for disscussion at the talks this week was policing. In political terms it means that the parties were discussing ways in which the RUC could be made more acceptable to the nationalist community as part of the overall agreement.

The debate, if indeed there was one, is timely, in respect of the announcement by Jack Straw that Roisín McAliskey would not be extradited to Germany because medical evidence showed that such a move would be unjust and oppressive.

Amidst the relief and joy felt by all right thinking people at Straw's decision, the quiet words of Roisín's solicitor Gareth Peirce, sent a cold chill through all of us. Ms Peirce said that Roisín's weak mental state had been caused by her treatment at the hands of the RUC in Castlereagh Interrogation Centre.

She stated that her client was in effect ``given the makings of a complete mental breakdown, by reason of the interrogation process at Castlereagh.'' She asked, ``what is going on there, what is being allowed to happen?''

What goes on at Castlereagh has exercised the minds of many people for a long time. In recent weeks David Adams was awarded £30,000 damages for criminal injuries sustained during his incarceration there. The court heard that the RUC took turns to jump Kung Fu style on his legs. That's what goes on in Castlereagh, and that's what has been going on since it first came into being.

In their book, ``Justice under Fire'' a number of eminent barristers detail some of the horror stories of arrests and detention in Castlereagh in the late 70s. They explain that in this specially constructed centre, the RUC are given the goodwill of the political and judicial authorities to embark on a programme of interrogation which could only be described as barbaric.

During those years police doctors working in places like Castlereagh ignored the complaints of those being held. Doctors who were brave enough to report cases of serious physical assaults found that their reports were either ignored or suppressed by the Diplock courts.

It was the Amnesty International report in 1979 which finally broke the wall of silence, by declaring that the RUC were systematically ill treating suspects to the degree that a public inquiry was warranted.

The British government, compelled to act, set up the Bennett committee. As with previous enquiries into the conduct of the RUC such as Scarman, Hunt and Compton, its conclusions produced no surprises. Bennett investigated some 1,600 formal complaints of assault which were backed up by independent medical evidence. Its findings were sufficiently ``whitewashed'' to exonerate the RUC from any culpability and not a single RUC person was ever charged as a result of Bennett's investigations.

It later emerged, during the early 80s, that while the RUC were brutalising young men and women in Castlereagh, Gough, and Strand barracks, Bennett was producing his cover-up, the RUC community relations branch were engaged in a ``charm offensive'' involving schools, community groups, and senior citizens clubs.

Many will recall the ``Blue Lamp Disco's'', the adventure camps, the top of the form quiz leagues and the seminars with ``key people'', successfully exposed by An Phoblacht and the Irish Times.

The thrust of this soft policing policy was to build up psychological profiles of teenagers during the rambles and the discos, with a view to recruiting them for the force or as potential informers.

One of those successfully targeted during that period was Raymond Gilmore, who was responsible for the arrest and imprisonment of 35 men and women from Derry.

Gilmore was back in the news this week, to launch his book, and advocate internment. He stated on the Talkback programme that the RUC recruited him as a police agent when he was 16 years old.

At the trial of those arrested on his information to the RUC, Gilmore was described by the trial judge Lowry, as a ``selfish man to whose lips a lie comes more readily than the truth''.

To the RUC, he was but a tool, a useful weapon to use against those whom they wished to take out of circulation. As a tactic, the use of paid perjurers eventually proved disastrous and the show trials collapsed in failure.

But the policy of recruiting young people as spies and informers continues along with brutality and intimidation, to form the basis of the ``RUC policing in the community strategy''. Its 90s version of the RUC ``Charm offensive'', is entiltled hands accross the community. It involves frequent visits by RUC personnel to schools, community and youth centres. ``Key people'' continue to collaborate in this programme, whose basic aim is to make the RUC acceptable in the community while they continue to build up and maintain intelligence files on the individuals with whom they come in contact.

Perhaps those involved might reflect on the quiet words of Gareth Peirce, and ask themselves what kind of human being would inflict such treatment on a pregnant woman, to cause her a complete mental breakdown. Perhaps those participants in the talks might ask themselves the same question?


Contents Page for this Issue
Reply to: Republican News