Benefit myths dispelled
If you repeat something often enough it ends up peddled as truth.
Never was this more true than in discussions about unemployment
benefit. It is an endlessly repeated mantra that unemployment
benefits are too high and act as a disincentive to taking up paid
employment in the formal economy.
Last week the Irish National Organisation of the Uunemployed went
some way towards dispelling that myth in their new research
document titled Welfare to Work.
The research analyses the impact paid employment has on the
after-tax income of family units of varying size. They look at
two particular cases. The first deals with the financial
implications of moving into employment with the support of the
Back to Work Allowance scheme. The second looks at the
implications when the scheme is not available.
The study covers income levels ranging from £8,000 to £15,000 and
finds that in both cases unemployed people are significantly
better off in paid employment.
The study also highlights a range of other problems faced by
unemployed people returning to work. These include the complex
nature of the tax and social welfare system and the lack of
awareness among the long-term unemployed of existing social
welfare measures.
The INOU recommends a ``properly resourced independent welfare
rights service'' and a number of changes in tax and social welfare
code such as a simplified means test and extending medical cards
to cover all children in a family.
Zero tolerance for corporate crime
Much has been made in the media during the week of the Zero
Tolerance principle in the so-called fight against crime. The
theory originated on the streets of New York where police
enforced every possible legal infringement as part of an overall
campaign to reduce the level of crime in the city.
Here on the Workers in Struggle page we were fascinated with the
proposal which has won so many friends this side of the Atlantic,
including Tony Blair, Mary Harney and newest convert Bertie
Ahern. We turned our minds to the full possibilities of Zero
Tolerance and wonder could it be applied to all crime including:
- Employers who are in breach of Labour Court judgements and
Labour Relations Commission recommendations. This would include
the public sector and so government ministers might find
themselves behind bars;
- Companies who breach environmental regulations;
- Tax fraudsters. Would we finally see an end to amnesties and
instead have prosecution and prison sentences for those who, to
quote Michael Lowry, fail to ``have their tax affairs in order''?
After all, you can get a week in Mountjoy for shoplifting £50
worth of goods, but you can't seem to get a day for £5,000 in
unpaid taxes;
Successful fraud prosecutions have been thin on the ground over
the last two years. But fraud, embezzlement, robbery and bribery
is a thriving industry. Would we see those company bosses and
others who selectively disappear with all the money being pursued
across national boundaries to those sunnier climates they seem to
end up in?
The only drawback to all of this is that if Zero Tolerance was
applied to these crimes we really would have to double or treble
our available prison places. Now there's a thought.