Ahern blames the victims
Electoral intervention slammed
BY NEIL FORDE
If he (Ahern) wishes to intervene in the six-county elections in
a real way Fianna Fáil should stand candidates. Otherwise he
should trust in the intelligence and judgement of the voters
Gerry Adams responds to Bertie Ahern
|
``It is not my role to influence electors elsewhere to vote for
one party or another''. This was the starting point for a journey
through the bizarre logic of Fianna Fáil leader Bertie Ahern last
week. Ahern was writing in the Irish News and was, according to
the paper, spelling out his view on ``the way forward,
politically, for peace''.
Ahern's tract was in fact a voting guide for the Six-County and
British voters. He urged ``the voters of Northern Ireland to
recognise that they have people power and to exercise it
decisively''. In the case of the nationalist electorate he argued
that ``Their expectations were disappointed'' in last year's Forum
elections.and that this ``should not be allowed happen again''.
The net outcome of Ahern's analysis was summed up in the Irish
News front page headline the same day. It proclaimed ``Tell Sinn
Féin no ceasefire no vote''.
This unwarranted intervention was tackled head on by Sinn Féin
President Gerry Adams. He said ``If he (Ahern) wishes to intervene
in the six-county elections in a real way Fianna Fáil should
stand candidates. Otherwise he should trust in the intelligence
and judgement of the voters to make up their own minds in an
informed manner''.
Bertie's Ahern's voting intervention was not the only bizarre
aspect of the article. It was in fact littered with references to
a picture of the political environment in Ireland that differs
from the real Ireland that we all actually live in.
Ahern opened his article berating voters for their ``fatalistic
acceptance about the powerlessness of the people in a democracy''.
The crime of the Six County voters was accepting that ``there can
be no progress on peace in the north until after the elections''.
``Any party in other jurisdictions who suggested for months in
advance that nothing could be done about the most serious problem
facing society until after an election would get very short
shrift from the voters''.
Here then is a serious problem with Ahern's analysis. He lays the
blame for political failure with its victims not its
perpetrators. He seems to overlook the fact that even though the
voters of the Six Counties may have participated in 21 elections
over the past 25 years there are in fact no democratic structures
in the Six Counties. Even within the relatively powerless
district councils discrimination and anti-democratic practices
are rife.
Bertie Ahern doesn't seem to realise that the Six Counties is not
a democracy. With its own parliament it twisted the electoral
system and created a unionist hegemony. With direct rule this has
been perpetuated by the British Government. The Six-County
electorate has been condemned to a political limbo. Does he not
realise that the consequences of this lack of democracy is in
fact one of the core factors in the conflict in Ireland today?
Ahern ignores this reality and instead tells the Irish News
readers of how the coming Leinster House elections are a stimulus
to the coalition government who are dealing with a whole range of
pressing matters, albeit belatedly.
So this is how democracy will work if we ever have it on an
all-Ireland basis. It will only be the prospect of electoral
pressure that coerces a government into action. This is a very
narrow view of representative democracy and clearly not a model
to aspire to.
Indeed, the prospect of a coming election may have been the
motivation behind Bertie's recent outbursts.
We find Ahern also turning to the issue of the Stormont talks. He
says ``more progress should have been demanded in the talks
process before they were adjourned''. He brings up the failed
Brooke/Mayhew talks which collapsed in 1992 and in which Sinn
Féin took no part. Ahern says that they did not reconvene for
four years.
He makes no reference to the fact that it was Sinn Féin's
programme to create a lasting peace that generated the much need
impetus to pull away from the failure of 1992 and into a real
inclusive talks process.
Ahern doesn't seem to recognise either that the 1996 Stormont
talks were also doomed to failure for the very reason that the
1992 talks failed, because the combined unionists created the
impasses and the collapses all with the aid of the British
Government while a succession of Dublin Governments were unable
or unwilling to make the necessary interventions to secure real
progress towards real talks. Bertie would do better to consider
those realities before he berates the voters.
Bertie Ahern has set out a guide for the Six-County voter and for
British voters but perhaps he should have looked closer to home.
He has been on many occasions a positive voice in the political
void created by the British Government-inspired collapse of the
peace process.
Perhaps he should set out publicly the criteria he thinks the
incoming Dublin Government will apply to restart the peace
process. He should tell us now how he will deal with a dithering
backtracking British Government. How will be tackle unionist
belligerence and discrimination in a talks process.?
Fianna Fáil's last interjection in Six-County elections came in
1933 when Eamon de Valera was elected a Stormont MP for South
Down. Dev never took his seat and for nearly 40 years Fianna Fáil
turned their back on the Six Counties. The aftermath of the arms
trial brought another 20 years of inaction. Albert Reynolds and
Bertie Ahern have broken that mould. It would be very sad if
Fianna Fáil after all the trauma of the last four years were to
get it wrong again.