Republican News · Thursday 10 July 1997

[An Phoblacht]

Labour fails first test

BY MICHEAL MacDONNCHA

Those Irish republicans and nationalists who dared to hope that the New Labour government might provide a new direction in Anglo-Irish relations have been outraged by the appalling performance of the new regime as it failed miserably in its first big test.

While republicans were always conscious of the disastrous record of British Labour governments in relation to Ireland they were entitled to expect that Labour would display fresher thinking and a more pro-active approach than the Tories. Sinn Féin did cautiously welcome the latest position of the Tony Blair government regarding Sinn Féin entry to talks. Gerry Adams acknowledged that the British government had taken up positions which are in advance of the last government.

In a key paragraph in his 25 June response to the British position Gerry Adams said that the situation ``on a whole range of issues of democratic and civil rights, which effect the day to day lives of nationalists, requires urgent attention. This is critical to building confidence.''

d how did the Labour government proceed to build confidence? Five days before Gerry Adams issued that statement British Secretary of State Mo Mowlam, RUC Chief Ronnie Flanagan, Security Minister Adam Ingram, and `Independent' Parades Commission chairperson Alastair Graham had reached a consensus that Orange feet should march down the Garvaghy Road. As John Hume put it pithily on Tuesday they had agreed that the solution to the problem on the Garvaghy Road was the problem itself - the Orange march.

`Consensus' is the important word in the leaked 20 June document. Despite all of Mo Mowlam's painful-to-watch protestations to the contrary the key decision had been made before she set out on her round of talks with Orangemen and nationalist residents. The document clearly describes the British government's ``negotiating brief'' as ``finding the lowest common denominator for getting some Orange feet on the Garvaghy Road''.

Mowlam claimed that the document looked at options but the entire document is based on the consensus as outlined. Most of it deals with how to get this result through negotiations if possible, how to present the negotiations publicly, the need for favourable media coverage of the final decision. Only one short paragraph is devoted to `other options'. This is highly revealing as it says ``a ban on the march with compensating measures for the Orangemen would not be excluded from the negotiations''. So the nationalist community on the Garvaghy Road was granted the courtesy from the British government that its demand would not be off the talks agenda.

That, it seems, was as near as the British came to taking an alternative decision. There was no question of them facing down Orange bigotry and unionist intransigence. They followed the pattern or all previous British governments. The British regime in the North - the Northern Ireland Office, the British Army and the RUC - was on automatic pilot and headed in the unionist direction it always takes. Turning off the automatice pilot, giving a new direction to British policy, would require real political will from Westminster. On the evidence of last weekend that political will is not there.

Despite having a huge majority in Parliament the Labour government behaved last week no better than the Major administration whose dependence on David Trimble's unionists became notorious towards the end of its term of office. It has deployed the rhetoric of reconciliation and even-handedness while implementing a policy that has reinforced sectarianism and continued the old pro-unionist agenda. On 2 November 1995 An Phoblacht opened its pages to Mo Mowlam who contributed an article which spoke of a ``shared journey towards mutual trust'' and a ``new foundation of trust and confidence''. Policing, she said, ``needs action to ensure that both communities feel equally treated''.

Look at those statements in light of the capitutlation to the threat of another unionist revolt such as happened last year. Measure them against the implementation of the Drumcree decision by massive British army and RUC force deployed against a small defenceless nationalist community.

Gerry Adams speaking at a Belfast press conference on Tuesday said that the leaked document was evidence of ``a planned betrayal of the Garvaghy Road by this British governmewnt''. He said:

``As an Irish republican I am not surprised by this British government's approach. British Secretaries of State come to this part of Ireland to defend British interests. British policy which lies at the heart of this conflict is based on the union and the union is founded on the unionist veto.

``After Tony Blair's pro-union Belfast speech I warned that the same officials working under Major are still making and implementing policy under Blair. They are still working to an old script. They are still giving the same bad advice and still pursuing a security/military agenda.''

It should not be forgotten that the present crisis has come about because of the unwillingness of the Orange Order to sit down and talk face to face with nationalist residents' groups. Their attitude of exclusion is echoed by the British government in the talks process with its refusal to recognise Sinn Féin's mandate and to treat its voters on a par with all others. Last weekend Orange and unionist intransigence was rewarded again.

Taoiseach Bertie Ahern has come under flak from John Bruton for stating that the Orange march should not be forced down Garvaghy Road. Yet again Bruton's disastrous position on the Six Counties has been highlighted. But the support nationalists seek from the Dublin government was expressed by Breandán MacCionnaith on 2 July:

``I get the impression that the Taoiseach realises that as the leader of nationalist Ireland he has a duty to all nationalists in Ireland, and he has a particular duty to those nationalist communities such as ours that are bearing the brunt of unionist and Orange domination.''

On Wednesday when Leinster House reassembled for the final two days' sittings before the recess, Sinn Féin TD Caoimhghin O Caoláin called on the government to give a lead to create progress out of the present crisis situation in the Six Counties. He said:

``The government carries a heavy responsibility to give a lead on two fronts. Firstly they must strongly represent the Irish national interest, and the rights of nationalists in the Six Counties, in the face of a British government which has outraged Irish opinion. In yet again conceding to the threat of violent unionism the British Labour government has carried on the shameful tradition of all its predecessors.

``Secondly the government needs in a thoughtful and intelligent way to apply itself to seeking international support for the right of people in the Six Counties to equality.

``The betrayal of nationalist communities by Mo Mowlam demonstrates most starkly the need for equality which we in Sinn Féin, in our approach to rebulding the peace process, have clearly identified as essential to progress.

``How can the British government which made these decisions declare itself to have no selfish strategic interest? The Irish government must provide the counter-balance.''

The Sinn Féin TD also made a call that Leinster House should remain in session during the present period of crisis in the Six Counties.

``In the present situation it is unacceptable that this legislature, which has just been elected, should this week be adjourning for all of three months. This House should remain in session for another week and there should be an early recall well before the proposed 30 September resumption. Both on the serious situation in the Six Counties and the other pressing issues which we face the legislators are failing the people if they adjourn for this prolonged period.''


Contents Page for this Issue
Reply to: Republican News