Republican News · Thursday 10 July 1997

[An Phoblacht]

Great Lessons in British doublespeak. No 1690

By Mary Nelis

Now, see here Mo, I resigned from the Masonic Order so people would believe I was impartial. It's not easy to be a Chief Constable and not belong to the Loyal Orders. Mind you, I'm still an ex-officio member and indeed I command a force of loyal brethren, though the past few years have been really difficult for the chaps. We all have to wear our sashes under our flak jackets and where that's not a problem the bowler hats under the helmets are. Phew.

I digress. What we need to do here is work out a line for the marching season. We need to sing with one voice, Mo, on all the 3,000 parades. We can't be seen - well, we can pretend that we may have differences - but we can't be seen in any way other than fully supporting the Brethren.

You ask why? Good worshipful Master Mo, don't you fully understand that the Orangemen are our friends, our relatives, our comrades in arms? Tony recognised that and he said as much when he visited us a few weeks ago. Remember he said the Union was safe and the Dublin Government should change the constitution so that all those nationalist troublemakers would no longer be second class citizens? They would not be citizens at all.

Tony was only saying what we in the RUC and the Loyal Orders have been saying for years. Send them all down South. There is no alternative in our Province to the invincible combination of the Orange Order and the Unionist Party. It's called the ``Big Drums'' principle, Mo, and it has stood by the union come thick or thin. No surrender. Not an inch. These are the watchwords of our democratic society, Mo, so you understand why we need to walk the Queen's highway 3,000 times each year. Yes, the province has always led the way in freedom of expression. I mean, can you imagine what this place would be like if all this stopped?

yway Mo, apart from standing by the Brethren, as a military man, and a man of considerable intelligence, gained over the years in the service of the Special Branch, we can bullshit all we like for the Loyal Orders, but the bottom line is that we don't want to fight a war on two fronts. It's the unionists we have to look out for here, Mo. We've always done it.

We have made sure over the years that they were adequately supplied with legal and illegal weapons. Not that they will need them this marching season. We can take the pressure off them by deploying the regulars, you know, the professional army, Mo.

Sure they are only the unemployed and disadvantaged of the UK, They're dispensable. So no worries there. Mind you, it helps to get more squaddies out on the field. No, silly, I didn't mean ``the field''. I meant the streets and fields around Garvaghy. It helps because I want to ensure that my men in Portadown have the opportunity to walk with their lodge. They can wear their collarettes underneath their flak jackets.

What will Labour backbenchers say? Well look Mo, old chap, sorry, Secretary of State, don't concern yourself with these trivialities. Sure New Labour will do the job just as well as Old Labour in 1974.

Harold, good socialist that he was, knew the score even then, though he was buddy buddy with Hume and Fitt. We had advised Whitelaw that powersharing would not be tolerated. They all knew at Westminster that we wanted Stormont back. But you know Mo, there are times when we need to teach parliament a lesson. They just use and abuse loyal Ulstermen when it suits them. So we were glad when our friends in the loyalist paramilitaries, the UDA, were superbly closing down the Province. It was a bonus for us when the Tories lost power, served them right, and Labour came in.

You may not recall the Loyalist workers strike, Mo. But when the loyal workers brought this place to a standstill, they knew they could rely on the RUC and the auxiliaries in the UDR to co-operate. Indeed the loyal workers in the power stations kept the supply on long enough to allow Harold to make the usual statement of not surrendering to those breaking the law and intimidating people.

Harold was convincing, Mo. The Labour government of the day understood the politics of double speak. In fact, Mo, I think you will be excellent when you need to explain to the nationalists that when we beat them off the streets and fire plastic bullets at their heads, it's to prevent them being assassinated by the more exuberant members of professionally trained death squads.

Look, there's no need to worry. Just remember of course, Ian Paisley, shrewd politician that he is, said we had only won a battle and he declared that the war should carry on, which is why we are having this little problem now, Mo. But I know we can rely on you to convince Labour fellow travellers of the Taigs, like Benn and Corbyn, that all this is about preserving the Union and democracy. You can us the old ``majority decide'' line.

There should be no trouble with the SDLP. Sure we did all this last year and the SDLP eventually came round to our way of thinking, which is to blame the IRA for everything. It works Mo, especially if we can organise a situation where Trimble and Hume can walk hand in hand in front of the Brethren.

I think Hume would go for it. He's always on about reaching an accommodation with the two traditions and we can guarantee that he will tell the Taigs to stay indoors and watch on TV the loyal Brethren walking along the Queen's Highway, while we knock the skulls off those who get in the way.

Mo, we have done this before. Our only concern now should be that nothing we will say or do will damage the British cause, which is to maintain the Union at all costs.

Of course Bertie will be disappointed but Fianna Fáil had their chance in `69 and blew it. Me, I'm looking forward to the All Ireland final, cross border relationships, eh Mo?

Yours,

Ronnie.


Contents Page for this Issue
Reply to: Republican News