North Report storm before publication
By Eoin O'Broin
Speculation regarding the contents of the North report into
disputed parades, to be released today 30 January, has led
many commentators to predict that both the Unionists and the
British government will respond negatively.
One newspaper report suggested that the report will be
shelved until after the Westminster election.
UTV news said that the report recommends that the RUC lose
its authority to decide on contentious marches, and a new
three to five person statutory body with executive powers
would take their place. The North commission has refused to
comment on any of the leaks.
However the leaked proposals have caused a strong reaction
from the Orange Order and unionist politicians. One Grand
Orange Lodge spokesperson stated; ``This
commission...represents a serious shift, not only in legal
terms but also in constitutional terms because what we are
having here are a denial of fundamental human rights, such
as the right of free assembly''. Ian Paisley called the North
commission a ``stop processions quango''.
Speaking on behalf of the Lower Ormeau Concerned Community,
Gerard Rice called for a fundamental redefinition of the
right to march ``if proposals for a parading tribunal are to
have any success''. He added, ``if the proposed tribunal is
unduly constrained by existing considerations to public
order and tradition then it is certain to fail and the North
body will merely be passing the `poisoned chalice' of
parades to someone else''.