Where unemployment is normal
By Laurence McKeown
I met a friend the other day with whom I spent time in
prison. He's a laid-back guy, the sort who reckons an issue
is not a problem unless it is raised repeatedly for several
weeks. We'll call this friend Theo.
yhow, we got to talking about the mid-1980s when there was
a lot of discussion in prison about Sinn Féin's entry into
electoral politics. Some were very wary of this new
development and questioned how Sinn Féin members would
conduct themselves in the council chambers.
In one such discussion a comrade made the outburst that all
Sinn Féin was interested in was building leisure centres.
This took the assembled group by surprise and there was
silence for a moment before Theo asked, ``how many have they
built?''. After a moment the reply came, somewhat
reluctantly, ``they haven't built any''. ``How many have they
asked to be built?'' Theo asked. This time it took a raised
eyebrow from Theo after a few moments before a reply was
elicited. ``I don't know that they've asked for any to be
built''.
Only because the cell was by this stage embarrassingly
silent the reply would never have been heard. Theo allowed
it to hang in the air for a moment and then asked with a
quizzical look on his face, ``Come to think of it, what's
wrong with leisure centres anyway?'' This was like a lifeline
to his opponent and he grasped it like someone who had come
up for the third and last time. ``Because it's all part of
the normalisation process, that's why.''
This sounded good. We had all read the lectures on
Normalisation. Things looked grim for Theo who still lay
slouched in his seat. But discussions like these were his
life's blood. ``Tell me this,'' he said ``did you ever go to
dances when you were out?'' ``Of course,'' came the reply. ``And
did you ever go to pubs for a night out?'' ``Sure.'' By this
stage Theo had moved to an upright position in his seat.
``Then what the fuck's wrong with someone going for a swim?''
We're now ten years older. Sinn Féin's participation in the
council chambers today is accepted as a given fact and,
outside of Belfast, many Unionists even find they can reach
agreement with them on certain issues. The state hasn't
collapsed as a result of such a move and neither have
republican principles. The issue of leisure centres is still
with us, however, because Sinn Féin today are to the fore in
trying to keep them open against Unionist attempts at
closure. They are involved in much more of course, which is
what I have been getting around to.
Following the cessation of hostilities by the IRA in 1994
the European Union responded by announcing a peace and
reconciliation package to the tune of £240 million. This
money was directed at those communities most affected by the
conflict and was to benefit in particular the long-term
unemployed, the young and ex-prisoners. In 1997 we don't yet
have peace, and reconciliation is for some later stage, but
no doubt once the Brussels bureaucracy was put in motion it
would have cost even more to halt it in mid-stride. So the
funds keep coming in.
Some Sinn Féin councillors, amongst others, have a role in
advising on the allocation of these moneys but I believe
their role should be extended beyond allocation to how the
money is spent, how decisions are made in relation to
expenditure, how those decisions are arrived at, on what
criteria, who the decision-makers are responsible to -
Brussels or the community - and how community input and
evaluation is ensured.
Success in these matters, I believe, should be gauged not by
how many commendations are received from Brussels but by the
extent of goodwill expressed by the communities concerned
and the impact evident upon them.
For some people, the Brussels financial package represents
merely an opportunity for career advancement. For others it
is a once in a lifetime chance to finally escape the vicious
poverty trap of unemployment and inadequate social welfare
payments. They are unequal starting points and thus the
injustices and discrimination perpetrated on these
communities down through the years are perpetuated if
relevant recruitment and employment processes are not put in
place to counteract this imbalance. It's a case of damned if
you are unemployed and damned to remain unemployed.
Indeed, as Theo might say, there's nothing wrong with
normalisation if it teaches us to swim - so long as we all
share the same pool.