Alas, poor Ken...
In the film The Greatest Story Ever Told John Wayne appeared
as the centurion at the foot of the cross and got his fee
for just being there and uttering the sentence ``Surely this
was the Son of Gaawwd.'' It has gone down as the most
ludicrous `cameo role' in cinema history. In his new version
of Hamlet Kenneth Branagh has far surpassed it.
John Gielgud gets a `part' (quick grimace and swoon) but not
in the play, not even in the play within the play, but in a
flashback within the play within the play. Then there is the
skull. Hamlet's famous ``Alas, poor Yorick'' speech is
addressed to a skull with curiously familiar prominent
teeth. We flash back in Hamlet's memory of the jester Yorick
and it's... Ken Dodd. This is just after we've been asked to
believe in Billy Crystal as one of the gravediggers.
In his ambition for a star-studded epic Branagh has produced
an outrageously overdone and overlong film. Treating
Shakespeare's work as Holy Writ, not a word is left out, so
that you spend four solid hours in the cinema. And if the
unedited text does not wear you out then the Dr Zhivagoesque
gold-braided uniforms, snowy landscapes and palatial
splendour will see you off.
Instead of keeping the staging sparse and letting the actors
bring out all the subtleties and intricacies of
Shakespeare's words, Branagh completely loses the run of
himself. The small incestuous royal court of Elsinore in the
dark middle ages becomes a glittering 19th century palace
swarming with extras. None of this can make the difficult
language more accessible. Where Branagh succeeded in
bringing Shakespeare alive in Henry V he fails here.
The pity is that the central characters are played
brilliantly by Branagh (Hamlet), Derek Jacobi (Claudius),
Richard Briers (Polonius) Kate Winslet (Ophelia) and Michael
Moloney (Laertes). (The exception is Julie Christie who is
wooden as Gertrude.)
Branagh, the boy who rose from Belfast Billydom to London
Luvviedom, has neglected Hamlet's advice to the players:
``Suit the action to the word, the word to the action, with
this special observance: that you o'erstep not the modesty
of Nature...''
BY MICHEAL MacDONNCHA
Harriet is a little girl who monitors her friends and
neighbours' movements and actions and writes them into her
secret notebook which is marked `PRIVATE'
Harriet is played in this action/comedy by 11 year old
Michelle Trachtenberg. Her nanny and mentor - Golly - is
played by Rosie O'Donnell. Both are extremely fond of each
other. However, the time has come when Golly has to leave.
Harriet's life is turned upside down. Her ambition in life
to be a successful writer is thwarted.
Her classmates become aware of her secret writings, and when
they decide to read its revealing contents, they take action
against her. Even her best friends, Sport and Janie, take
revenge.
Her ambition to be a writer is now in jeopardy. Her friends
have turned against her. What is she to do?
I found the film well suited to its PG rating - it's aimed
at an audience of 8-12 year olds. It can be boring at times
and some things are predictable. However, overall it was
enjoyable.
The film is based on the novel ``Harriet the Spy'' by Louise
Fitzhugh which was awarded the New York Times ``Outstanding
Book Award'' in 1964. Approximately 2.5 million copies of
the book have been sold to date and making it into a film
was clearly a labour of love for director Bronwen Hughes -
she first read the book when she was 8 years old.
By Seamus Hazlett
If you were a fan of Fawlty Towers (I have to say I cringed
rather than laughed through most episodes) or Monty Python
(again, it missed me) then Fierce Creatures, the new comedy
starring John Cleese, is probably for you. The movie
features basically the same leading cast as appeared in A
Fish Called Wanda. Cleese, accompanied by Jamie Lee Curtis,
Kevin Kline and Michael Palin, deliver what they believe to
be a rather good comedy about a zoo under threat of
extinction at the hands of its new owner, a ruthless
corporate investor (Kline).
This story, though, while it has a few rare moments, is
ultimately unoriginal and pretty unfunny. If most of the
animals on show were tame rather than fierce, then so was
the comedy. But if you refer back to my initial comment and
actually liked either Fawlty Towers or Monty Python, you
will probably disregard my opinion and go see Fierce
Creatures anyway. On your heads be it. I pronounce it a lame
duck and to hell with the begrudgers.
By Liam O Coileain